![]() It uses on Mac’s Aqua interface style, which blends in well with the native Mac feel. ![]() NeoOffice is specifically Mac only, with its original purpose to be run natively on Mac (OpenOffice did not run natively on Macs until version 3). It has a lot of add-ons though, which you can download along with those dictionaries. It no longer comes with many language dictionaries by default, which is nice for installation speed and hard drive size, but not so much if you have to download a lot of other languages. Open Office is still a great free suite of tools to work with, but it still takes up a lot of RAM and energy. xls files, but can only read the latest versions of Microsoft’s. It comes with read and write support for Microsoft’s. Personally, I prefer a little color in the suite, but this is a minor change, but it does mean that it looks better in Windows, and especially better in Linux, than it does on Mac. With version 3.3, its icons have less color, going for a more minimalist look. With version 3, it became a native app on Mac, and has for a long time been one of the primary default office suites on many version of Linux. OpenOffice is available for Mac, Windows, and Linux. NOTE: This comparison is between OpenOffice 3.3, NeoOffice 3.2.1, and LibreOffice 3.5 OpenOffice Startcenter ![]() I’m going to keep it simple with what most people will notice, and not get too technical about data, code, etc. I’ve decided to take the time to look at these 3 suites and write about what is good and bad about each. Looking at my blog’s stats recently, I’ve noticed that among the searches that lead people here is people asking for comparisons between OpenOffice, NeoOffice, and/or LibreOffice.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |